On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Yes, NTP has no relation with the DS, except that it's only needed by the KerberosServer. The other server which has no relation with DS is HtppServer, but as it's a server used to have a HTTP connection with the DS, it's somehow related.On 10/15/10 10:50 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny<email@example.com> wrote:
On 10/15/10 10:29 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:One issue is that not all servers (only NTP atm?) have a relationship
I wonder if another hierarchy (DIT structure) makes more sense:This is an option. It reverts the logic we currently have in place, but it's
-> Replication consumer
-> Replication provider
This way it should also be possible to define multiple directory
services with their own servers.
smart, assuming it covers both concerns we have :
- with such a hierarchy, we allow someone to define 2 servers having 2
- we also have all the elements cleanly linked together.
to the directory service. But I think the main purpose of ApacheDS is
to provide services the need a hierarchical data store underneath.
So at the end, I still think that it's all about DS on top, and all the server under.