On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <firstname.lastname@example.org
> On 10/12/10 8:36 AM, Pierre-Arnaud MARCELOT wrote:
>> I agree that it could be interesting to have this kind of feature.
>> Wouldn't it be more interesting to have the ability to give a list of
>> specific ATs that should be hidden instead.
>> We have that in Studio and it gives much more power and flexibility.
> That's a pretty good idea.
> However, I think that this kind of protection can be better handled by the
> ACI subsystem. Atm, as it's a bit broken, I'd like to keep this parameter
> along until we have a better way to manage ATs.
> That also means the move was not stupid, it's just that it's temporarily
> useful, and probably easier to manage than a global ACI.