this will be a huge a change, IMO we should keep it as it is for now
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Stefan Seelmann <email@example.com
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Hi guys,
>> it seems that when I did the big modification (merging all the Messages)
>> last month, I forgot to uncomment the dsml-parser which is part of shared.
>> I had it working by pointing to the ldap-api project, as it now depends on
>> it, but that was not enough to be able to build it when uncommented in the
>> shared/pom.xml file, as shared does not depend on ldap-api.
>> However, in my mind, the next step was to integrate the ldap-api project
>> into shared (well, imo, shared <==> ldap API up to a point).
>> Here is what I suggest we do :
>> - move ldap-client into shared
>> - rename shared to ldap-api
>> - move all the DIR-SHARED issues to DIRAPI
>> - and release ldap-api
> I agree and would like to discuss some more steps before releasing the API:
> - should we rename the package names o.a.d.shared or keep it?