directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Seelmann <seelm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Continuing the shared modules merge
Date Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:59:02 GMT
Sounds good, except one thing: As we have a separate shared-dsml
module and in your previous mail you said you want to keep it, I
wonder if it makes sense to keep shared-ldif in a separate module? An
the other side, LDIF is used all the time when dealing with LDAP.

Kind Regards,
Stefan


On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Hi guys,
>
> as I have merged all the schema modules into shared-ldap-schema, I'm
> continuing to merge the modules that does not deserve to be standalone. Here
> are the next targets :
> - shared-ldap-constants should be part of shared-ldap
> - shared-ldif should be part of shared-ldap
> - shared-ldap-jndi may remain a separate module atm
> - shared-ldap-converter should be part of shared-ldap
> - shared-cursor should be part of shared-ldap
> - shared-asn1 and shared-asn1-codec are an anomaly : right now, I really
> think those two modules should be merged into shared-ldap, but as
> shared-asn1-codec has a dependence on MINA, it's better to keep them
> independent. I would like to be able to get rid of this MINA dependency, by
> defining the MINA references through providers, but this is a 1 day effort I
> don't have the desire to do now. If someone have time to work on decoupling
> shared from MINA completely, that would be a good move (well, MINA
> dependencies could be declared with a scope <test>, but otherwise, we should
> not depend on MINA at all, IMO).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>

Mime
View raw message