Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4C7AB293.8030506@labeo.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:18:43 +0200
From: Stefan Zoerner <stefan@labeo.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Documentation] Version in pom.xml (Re: User Guide documentation)
References: <4C6959BB.1010904@otego.com>	<4C7AA70D.9030702@labeo.de>
 <AANLkTi=cZSPxsGVucbz3EDu=WtHeT156DK2X-hB5nkyL@mail.gmail.com>
 <4C7AAA4E.6090403@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C7AAA4E.6090403@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Felix Knecht wrote:
> If so I wonder why we can't have it in the apacheds module - if it's the
> same version. How to release a bug fixed documentation for a specific
> apacheds release?

Yes, currently it is side by side

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds-manuals/trunk
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/trunk

which is not very helpful w.r.t. documentation of both 1.5 (server.xml / 
Spring) and 2.0 (DIT) configuration style.


> I suggest having the major.minor version the same like apacheds and the
> bugfix version a sequence.
> For ads 1.5.x documentation version would start at 1.5.0.

Anyway, I will use

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds-manuals/trunk

to document the 1.5.7 situation for the Basic User's Guide. Most of the 
content is probably the same for 2.0 (Exception: the configuration).

Should I change the version in pom.xml for apacheds-manuals simply to 
1.5.8.SNAPSHOT?

Greetings from Hamburg,
     StefanZ