Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22819 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2010 18:44:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 18:44:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 58100 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 18:44:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 58050 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 18:44:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 58043 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2010 18:44:22 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:44:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.179.121.35] (HELO fep15.mx.upcmail.net) (62.179.121.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:43:59 +0000 Received: from edge05.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep15-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20100829184328.QJUX1514.viefep15-int.chello.at@edge05.upcmail.net> for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:43:28 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.50] ([84.74.100.246]) by edge05.upcmail.net with edge id 0JjS1f06S5JxopQ05JjUE3; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:43:28 +0200 X-SourceIP: 84.74.100.246 Message-ID: <4C7AAA4E.6090403@apache.org> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:43:26 +0200 From: Felix Knecht Reply-To: felixk@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100808 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [Documentation] Version in pom.xml (Re: User Guide documentation) References: <4C6959BB.1010904@otego.com> <4C7AA70D.9030702@labeo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=O+FWVpunvrlG1gSnSO6WiIQ7o0MJ4laHqrEcUJ8XjIg= c=1 sm=0 a=Tv0EgDwpqBIA:10 a=pXoq77xVGrQA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=j-ZH9rREb52dz2CnOKEA:9 a=GfDhjzoCN6do4XomzHIA:7 a=TJQxugAVjPjVl2-jGPSUW9xPzj8A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> currently, in the pom.xml it states version 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. How about >> replacing it with the ApacheDS server version, in order to reflect for which >> version it belongs to? > having the current server version is best If so I wonder why we can't have it in the apacheds module - if it's the same version. How to release a bug fixed documentation for a specific apacheds release? I suggest having the major.minor version the same like apacheds and the bugfix version a sequence. For ads 1.5.x documentation version would start at 1.5.0. Felix -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkx6qk4ACgkQ2lZVCB08qHEb6wCgv71sZVUwW2lgFYu3DLp+j6Ex R9IAoKDw1FbQpmtmclKolQ7SF/C0jeGU =hrRA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----