From dev-return-34678-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Thu Aug 05 11:38:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13895 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 11:38:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 11:38:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 44013 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 11:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 43904 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 11:38:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 43897 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 11:38:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:38:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:37:59 +0000 Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so8297139wyb.37 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:37:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:content-type :subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=MGek9ZrNAtElaEiSooz5cD/ElCo6KRa8Gg86Vpr8pos=; b=JivUcGMT0MGqFdOW7LsP0+DVuNoNDWOJHudlgIPyZWhshlg7Qun896mzzR9o1bGYfX OBPIlSXucXgIRtrTG0g80SSrqnJlSNs8BKX1PceJ7h0+ZWbjoTKAGlQ8yaMBylU3gYM2 QaRSSQ+Sqlo4JFYQedGl7KXWoqHOGOi1ubykY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; b=c3Qkw3F42sS6ei66m7DmvIqf1mYVfY+DF3qStJeT5vuTaZnOcFLCt7wN+QWeKwvBEe 0Y4iKs16/A7Wjcfj3DTR5KsPgMhlzIZvWtMlj51SAFHkOZjY9aPVSdIKg1UKEnjjp6K7 +4nO8vBGXzfNCPPUfcmKKvPMUQ0E6V3QSmXcE= Received: by 10.227.208.7 with SMTP id ga7mr8903135wbb.126.1281008257487; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e31sm67550wbe.5.2010.08.05.04.37.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--94139753 Subject: Re: What about cleaning the branches ? Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:37:34 +0200 Message-Id: <50BB87E6-9E23-4057-9B83-047703F2EAF8@marcelot.net> To: Apache Directory Developers List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) --Apple-Mail-1--94139753 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi guys, Begin forwarded message: > From: Alex Karasulu > Date: 5 ao=FBt 2010 13:31:19 HAEC > To: Apache Directory Developers List > Subject: Re: What about cleaning the branches ? > Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" = >=20 > +1 to removing the branches >=20 >=20 > As a thought it might be nice to put a file in the branches directory = listing the old branches that were removed at which revision so if need = be their deletes can be reverted. Don't think this will be the case but = it's always nice to do this because it's not trivial getting SVN to give = u this info along with what the branch was created for. +1 You're right, it's never easy, especially when there's a long SVN = history. Begin forwarded message: > From: Emmanuel Lecharny > Date: 5 ao=FBt 2010 10:10:08 HAEC > To: Apache Directory Developers List > Subject: What about cleaning the branches ? > Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" = > Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org >=20 > Hi guys, >=20 > we have many branches we created in the past 3 years. Maybe it's time = to cleanup some of them ? +1 Regards, Pierre-Arnaud= --Apple-Mail-1--94139753 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi = guys,

Begin forwarded message:

From: Alex Karasulu = <akarasulu@apache.org>
Date: 5 ao=FBt 2010 = 13:31:19 HAEC
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org><= br>
Subject: Re: What about cleaning the branches = ?
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org><= br>

+1 to removing the = branches


As a thought it might be nice = to put a file in the branches directory listing the old branches that = were removed at which revision so if need be their deletes can be = reverted. Don't think this will be the case but it's always nice to do = this because it's not trivial getting SVN to give u this info along with = what the branch was created for.

+1

You're right, = it's never easy, especially when there's a long SVN = history.


Begin forwarded = message:

From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
=
Date: 5 ao=FBt 2010 = 10:10:08 HAEC
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org><= br>
Subject: What about cleaning the branches = ?
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org><= br>
Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org

Hi guys,

we have many branches we created in the = past 3 years. Maybe it's time to cleanup some of them = ?

+1

Reg= ards,
Pierre-Arnaud
= --Apple-Mail-1--94139753--