Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69531 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 16:27:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 16:27:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 9422 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 16:27:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 9369 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 16:27:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 9358 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 16:27:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:27:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ayyagarikiran@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.50] (HELO mail-fx0-f50.google.com) (209.85.161.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:27:38 +0000 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1614570fxm.37 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:27:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xBL19XDK7RQ1UgfSWZqMlB5kbvI6e88t1I7tnVNwHOY=; b=T0z35IgWrUKyNYhkyZGvKtb0kehP2qJkGJgSAh1s1TH4FB+53x209+LwBVDlsqsoG8 uzhuYZEK3xtSDg5PmCOjQijlcmngGQ9ScJC8Y+GarxtVwDWkR2u9jNelU2hT7v+yFSdd c0waGa+2elbxzjksVzFCfPgKIiy9KeoELabn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ox8PPH9M/z1M7ddzkl8YPHm6XAOYVEsS4QBkOs8/Lndo83KfxtjY9/rYnOcblFTrcH XB0wiE1/6/e6srW20LWqf+cNQcF/ixGRhE4GTBkW0alYhVQTofP3qu8TI91/agvVcI5V WUPFeQ6wyCKg3IhvtNiM+gvlTwV87WMwCEWLE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.122.147 with SMTP id l19mr10243624far.83.1280334433399; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: ayyagarikiran@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.123.143 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:27:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C0D7A38.8000809@gmail.com> <371F3B55617C6E98EB0CA58E@192.168.1.2> <4C0DDFDC.6060509@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:57:13 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TYsCTT9azTsDTRkWCit9ffWjZ8M Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some more speed improvement for basic operations From: Kiran Ayyagari To: Apache Directory Developers List , elecharny@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny w= rote: > An update : > > as of today (July 28th), I'm able to run the search perf test and obtain > those values : > > June, 8th : > search : 19 727 search/s > > July 28th : 35 812 search/s this is great :) > > NOTE : this is for a simple search (ie, OBJECT scope) and no entry in the > base. The test does not go through any network (though no BER > encoding/decoding). It just check the speed of the internal server. > > Also it's interesting as it prove there is a wide margin of improvement i= n > the server itself. > > From the last test I did, I think we can gain 30 to 40% more by using a D= N > cache (DN parsing and normalization count for 26% of the whole CPU), and = we > have a spurious call to the hasEntry() method which costs 13,5% of the CP= U. > The log system costs 2.75%, something we can also improve. > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel L=E9charny > www.iktek.com > Kiran Ayyagari