Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=WExrVbuUN0iD//4A0D/6FxQUv/IsGKWYwg+3F+MtCRja+ZMaS6/q0v8EjPKQN6PmDK
         k+S+0hb80CmdNela5OIchW/vzckyBTCu+0FEKFw0YE7/3tqP+yqpbF67SX0gQpFKdYW8
         eSzCtcZP0FREj7Pp913cJhM1l/bLmAvkZw5RY=
Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pajbam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r947413 - in /directory/shared/trunk/ldap: pom.xml
 src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/codec/LdapTransformer.java
From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C092E73.2050503@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:54:10 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A80C1D43-3800-49D6-8F02-3A49C9BADE8B@marcelot.net>
References: <20100523134615.376C823889BF@eris.apache.org>
 <198083B5-C44C-4778-9A43-0D5C8A4BF6FE@marcelot.net>
 <4C053854.2070606@apache.org> <4C092E73.2050503@apache.org>
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>

Hi Stefan,

Kiran had the same build problem.

Strangely, the problem disappeared when he removed his maven repository =
and tried again.

Kiran, can you confirm?

Maybe we could ask artifacts under org/apache/directory to be removed on =
the Continuum machine.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

On 4 juin 2010, at 18:48, Stefan Seelmann wrote:

> Felix Knecht wrote:
>> Hi Pierre-Arnaud
>>=20
>>> I'm currently reviewing the dependency tree of each project in =
Apache DS.
>>=20
>>> When generating the installers I've found a lot of new dependencies =
(since the last release) in the generated lib folder, and especially =
this one: findbugs:annotations.
>>=20
>>> Are you sure of the scope of this dependency?
>>=20
>> Thanks for heads up!
>>=20
>> No. I thought it wouldn't be taken when having scope "compile".... =
It's
>> used to avoid false positives when generating the findbugs reports.
>> "provided" seems to be the better solution.
>=20
> The problem with "provided" is now that the build fails with Java5 =
[1].
>=20
> Seems like the dependent modules have problems when the annotation =
class
> is missing.
>=20
> As a workaround I added the findbugs annotations dependency with scope
> "provided" to each the shared, apacheds, and ldap-api parent pom. Any
> other idea?
>=20
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan
>=20
>=20
> =
[1]http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=3D346851=
&projectGroupId=3D139&projectId=3D2675&projectName=3DApacheDS+1.5+Build+Wi=
th+Dependencies