Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71861 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 09:57:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 09:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 64073 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 09:57:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 64017 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 09:57:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 64010 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 09:57:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:57:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:57:10 +0000 Received: by wyf22 with SMTP id 22so322400wyf.37 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 02:56:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PtUcyo+9en+n98r7BY6+hFMXt9p0k6RDmun5AmStwrM=; b=xB1g+1cnwtLHXjZjkCk1zcJ46YHdq5JMc2BreR0ovqFMHImKgjVqbppquHduk3IHdW bhdAWI4DZ6Pi/s7ROB+y2vwG3sOvOKCTHwcbMHpqF/7eTf7qimzceVhdJRFzcogcezEk e/N60EUNNj8/1zmr2psM2bhupOh1sBYJ6GAYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AVN2LVEi5ic9fuZLYuevvamHDjAhpC3hyJ6SX5Q5mQNEzWUQHqxkTNqG9A+ppRZT0h zdajUCXjHVEuH25iHlgrfau8P5R7OwNfgWCu2lIU1WQAE6Fv00xROZcdHhlInw8xI3RB VR5U7R3s+ttyje6rNfvZchU3KrTpPj3VkKE9U= Received: by 10.227.156.78 with SMTP id v14mr4377042wbw.25.1275904610224; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 02:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local ([78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u36sm36570221wbv.0.2010.06.07.02.56.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Jun 2010 02:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C0CC289.7090208@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:57:29 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: What should we do with apacheds-server-tools ? References: <4C0910EE.7030203@gmail.com> <4C0A0CF9.9030306@apache.org> <55D1C8E4-B97B-4BB4-B890-58C46195B4BF@marcelot.net> In-Reply-To: <55D1C8E4-B97B-4BB4-B890-58C46195B4BF@marcelot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/7/10 10:30 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: > +1. > > I would add that with the removal of the server.xml file and the future changes in the InstallationLayout of ApacheDS, the current implementation of the Server Tools will be completely irrelevant and outdated. > > What about starting a complete re-vamp of these tools for the 2.0 release (2.0.0 RC1 may been ship without them but 2.0 final should be shipped with them) ? > I see that Sumit Goyal has started to work on some replacement for the old LDAP tools we had once upon a time ( (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-9) Let's see what it brings, then we can probably extend those toos a bit. No urgence right now, et's first release 2.0-RC1. But the idea is there. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel L�charny www.nextury.com