Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53113 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 07:34:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 07:34:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 29997 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 07:34:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 29902 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 07:34:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 29893 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 07:34:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 07:34:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1460.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 07:34:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 53039 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 07:34:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 07:34:34 -0000 Message-ID: <4BFA2C09.90704@apache.org> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:34:33 +0200 From: Stefan Seelmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [ApacheDS] What about switching to UUID for the primary key before 2.0 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alex Karasulu wrote: > Guys, > > What do you think about locking in on using the UUID for the primary key > (global) of entries across partitions. This will have some serious > advantages one of which is supporting aliases across partitions. > > Thoughts? +1 from my side. Kind Regards, Stefan