directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Last thought about ADS 2.0 before crashing ...
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 09:02:06 GMT
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Stefan Zoerner <stefan@labeo.de> wrote:

> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> I think that until we reach a point where we have a stable 2.0, we should
>> go for 2.0.0-RC1. Then we can abandon this RC stuff.
>>
>> The reason is that we have a hell lot of things to do in order to be
>> production ready for 2.0, including docs and tests (I mean, production
>> tests). We are far from having all those guys finished... Also having a
>> 2.0.0-RC1 will help us to send a message that ADS-2.0-RC1 is finally out
>> there, ready to be tested, and we need feedback. If we release a 2.0 (no
>> RC1) then we might have negative feedback like "it's crap, don't use it !",
>> something we don't want to have for a final version. It *will* take time
>> before we stabilize : remember 1.0-RCs ?
>>
>
>
> Exactly. The documentation lacks a lot of basic things. Many changes in the
> development have not been applied to the confluence Wiki.
>
> The description on how to embed the server for instance or the way how to
> use ApacheDS in unit tests have to be updated before officially releasing a
> 2.0.
>
> A release candidate gives us a chance to consolidate that.
>
> But we have the same problem as always. Which confluence space to use?
> Shall we reactivate DIRxSRVx20, and move things from 1.5 to there?
>
>
+1

-- 
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu

Mime
View raw message