directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Knecht <fel...@apache.org>
Subject Re: log4j <-> slf4j
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 16:34:42 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/26/10 18:19, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 5/26/10 6:05 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
>>
>> You're right, I overlooked it. But when performance is an issue why
>> using a facade?
>>    
> Performance is not an issue at all here.
> 
> Slf4j is just a faced, it carries no load. The big advantage is that we
> don't force users to use log4j if they are forced to use stuff like CLOG
> or even worse, JUL.

Thanks for explanation.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkv9TaIACgkQ2lZVCB08qHHQlgCgjS6BC+kiouY6Ll10TtHU+tt7
NFoAoLGbJOPeKX2Kls/nIg7sM+jJWkAD
=W8Os
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message