directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <>
Subject Re: log4j <-> slf4j
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 16:19:43 GMT
On 5/26/10 6:05 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
> You're right, I overlooked it. But when performance is an issue why
> using a facade?
Performance is not an issue at all here.

Slf4j is just a faced, it carries no load. The big advantage is that we 
don't force users to use log4j if they are forced to use stuff like CLOG 
or even worse, JUL.

Emmanuel L├ęcharny

View raw message