directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Knecht <fel...@apache.org>
Subject Re: log4j <-> slf4j
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 16:05:15 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/26/10 17:57, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Felix Knecht <felix@otego.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> To me it looks like we're using 2 log frameworks: logj4 and slf4j. IMO
>> we should try to eliminate one of them and have a main one (for all the
>> projects maybe exept studio) - but which one?
> slf4j is just a facade for various logging framework implementations.
> (no big deal, thought you might have overlooked)

You're right, I overlooked it. But when performance is an issue why
using a facade?

Felix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkv9RrsACgkQ2lZVCB08qHESMwCdHvVWRNhMb7JO8RaZemk/4aQ+
gyUAn0ZHiYTutHeUP3xZlqjf+CgGNcO+
=ABca
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message