directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kiran Ayyagari (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DIRSERVER-985) PartitionConfig is specific to Jdbm
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 20:51:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12871937#action_12871937
] 

Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-985:
------------------------------------------

I don't think the above mentioned interfaces are present any more in the current trunk. With
the recent excellent refactoring effort done by Seelmann it is
a lot easier to create a partition/store implementation.

Guess we can close this 'not relevant to current trunk' issue.

> PartitionConfig is specific to Jdbm
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-985
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-985
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Chris Custine
>            Assignee: Chris Custine
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-RC1
>
>
> PartitionConfiguration is specific to Jdbm and is not an interface, so in order to implement
a custom configuration you must extend this class and override some methods and private vars
in order to properly imeplement a custom version.  This works just fine but is pretty much
unintuitive.  PartitionConfiguration probably needs to be an interface with the required methods
defined and the current PartitionConfiguration code moved to an implementation of it specifically
for Btree/Jdbm.
> As a workaround in 1.5.0, you can extend PartitionConfiguration and override private
variable partitionContext and getPartitionContext().

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message