Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of keheliya.gallaba@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Orv13hSntVImSRaPfYJWMAasgnQLTAMROIHjkZv7WE+bJMr/dYeCfXF8LP3P3NFlA+
         azhbmqQKiDwizwV2u7f1sdN8PMUcn41giPbkFybTsJXTg2gcqegqpqRFlIsKfsgc5YvH
         Sn18QeKyE1R8wD+4jKeDZDvqYqRiMs8hNEUm4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cdc780e51003280642t7eb75692yf80b9c7fc8683edc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cdc780e51003080056w3b87f15ev63d0f6c5665c8e0e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B9529A4.70301@apache.org>
	 <cdc780e51003082050x75dc6fi94ed7c8abb041766@mail.gmail.com>
	 <cdc780e51003240003i3f165fd1u5bbfb428ab31bd7b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7858173A-DE60-4EB2-A593-1C5E73F51722@marcelot.net>
	 <cdc780e51003280642t7eb75692yf80b9c7fc8683edc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:47:40 +0530
Message-ID: <cdc780e51003292117p5c97c6ceidef7372a243b4534@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for 'LDAP proxy GUI' Project Idea
From: Keheliya Gallaba <keheliya.gallaba@gmail.com>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Dear Directory Developers,

I've submitted my proposal to official 'GSoC 2010' site at the link
[1]. All of your reviews and comments are most welcome. I'm eligible
to edit it till 9th April. Looking forward to working with you all.

[1] http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/private/google/gsoc2010/keheliya/t126989533457

Thank you,
Best Regards,
Keheliya

On 28 March 2010 19:12, Keheliya Gallaba <keheliya.gallaba@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Pierre-Arnaud,
>
> Thanx for the quick feedback. I'm waiting till March 29th to upload
> the proposal officially and ready to make changes till Apiral 6th as
> you've mentioned to make it perfect. Meanwhile I'm giving a try to fix
> the bugs which were brought to my attention in the IRC chat.
> I am very happily waiting for all the feedback for a good proposal and
> further guidance on the path I've taken for contribution from all the
> Directory Developers.
>
> Best Regards,
> Keheliya
>
> On 24 March 2010 21:44, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
>> Hi Keheliya,
>>
>> This looks pretty good.
>>
>> The diagram helps for understanding.
>>
>>
>> What's the next step?
>> I've read here that students will be able to apply from March 29 to April 9.
>> http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2010/faqs#student_apply
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>
>>
>> On 24 mars 2010, at 08:03, Keheliya Gallaba wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Directory Developers,
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the feedback in the ML and IRC regarding my initial
>>> draft for the LDAP diagnostic tool plugin to Apache Directory Studio
>>> in GSoC 2010. I have come up with a newer version of the document with
>>> the changes you have mentioned. Specifically, I have elaborated about
>>> the use cases of it as a debugging tool, implementation details about
>>> the architecture (with a diagram) etc. and changed the references to
>>> newer versions of RFCs
>>>
>>> New link to the 'LDAP diagnostic tool plugin to Apache Directory
>>> Studio' project proposal draft:
>>> http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AchQu7BiiRdcZHNqbmJ0NV82NnpmNHh0ZGd2&hl=en_GB
>>>
>>> Your comments and feedback are very much appreciated as always.
>>>
>>> On 9 March 2010 10:20, Keheliya Gallaba <keheliya.gallaba@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> First of all thanx Stefan and Stefan ;-) for the quick yet informative
>>>> feedback. And thanks Lecharny and Marcelot for the support and ideas
>>>> for coming up with the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 March 2010 19:40, Stefan Zoerner <stefan@labeo.de> wrote:
>>>>> Although you mention "debug purposes" in your Synopsis, I would emphasize
>>>>> this aspect a little bit more. It makes clear why there is real value for
>>>>> our users.
>>>>
>>>> In my next revision of the document, as Zoerner mentioned I will
>>>> elaborate more on the benefits of the Proxy GUI and specially about
>>>> the use cases of it as a debugging tool.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 March 2010 22:15, Stefan Seelmann <seelmann@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> - The latest LDAP RFC are 4510-4519. If you want to study RFCs please
>>>>> check out those.
>>>>>
>>>>> - As a design goal I think it would be nice to separate the proxy core
>>>>> (the part doing the network communication and stores logs) from the GUI
>>>>> part. This would make it possible to reuse the proxy core for a proxy
>>>>> service. I don't think that you need to implement a separate service and
>>>>> a communication protocol to the GUI. Additional such separation makes it
>>>>> easier to write unit test.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And as Seelmann said, I will refer the new RFCs.
>>>> +1 for the Proxy Core and GUI separation idea. It will be a good
>>>> architecture and will make things easy for expansion and testing. I
>>>> will revise the document illustrating the proposed architecture.
>>>>
>>>> Eagerly looking forward for more feedback...
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Keheliya Gallaba
>>>> http://galpotha.wordpress.com
>>>> http://twitter.com/keheliya
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> --
>>> Keheliya Gallaba
>>> http://galpotha.wordpress.com
>>> http://twitter.com/keheliya
>>
>>
>
> Best Regards
>
> --
> Keheliya Gallaba
> http://galpotha.wordpress.com
> http://twitter.com/keheliya
>


-- 
Keheliya Gallaba
http://galpotha.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/keheliya