Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13860 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 14:52:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 14:52:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 31656 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 14:52:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 31620 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 14:52:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 31613 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 14:52:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:52:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.152] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:52:42 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so3575545fgb.1 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/7Y0LxSQk/4zNjXjQphro28QDH2n4G5TS0I7vdSLdhc=; b=l6pyOqKuWySTAGPRUzl2aTB7GA8xvL6q1lT92l0JnJqa7TGOrHGVARGfBOS+k10bq9 MbZtg+607Pn0VU45Bs8Mg1/8TqIIuisfyUlDICd4oVvkYewQBo4W8DafwiqbaRnsjIBo hAFzo520UjcDlA8jV0DXs85dfDc2+PqgissR4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eZAaLQC/lcYBVblfaMWGsIfjFLYQPUdL8vhpQk2PbTeAu+RRtejlmMATZ7W8qXZoUJ v2R69ovw3+B9abiJZ9obpGqUH88DvNnWYqRQh5QQ9P6wtgpOcu6YWlRBHw2mTghetpyU iCLFw2L0UZTbPpr68fh0k3F0l/pxxyOCH0tVE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.183.67 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BB20C66.8070903@gmail.com> References: <1cbc90c11003300614j7dc6adadk7509f14df781356c@mail.gmail.com> <5BF76843-620B-4E58-A37B-A4F42170D828@marcelot.net> <4BB20C66.8070903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:52:21 +0300 Received: by 10.239.140.197 with SMTP id y5mr568446hby.113.1269960741708; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Client-API] Moving client-api to shared From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List , elecharny@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6299ae363ec048305c607 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f6299ae363ec048305c607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thinking > >> of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared. >>> >>> >> This is a chicken and egg problem as they both depends on each other. >> How are you going to rename shared ? >> >> >> >> >>> wdyt? >>> >>> >> +1 for the move to shared >> +0 for the rename of shared. >> >> > IMO, shared *is* the API, client and server. If we are to rename it, I > would suggest ldap-api. Shared means nothing anyway. > > > I agree with you 100% but we need to put shared into order if we are going to really release this thing. There's a lot of package disorder and cleanup required. Regards, -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu --001485f6299ae363ec048305c607 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Emmanuel Lechar= ny <elecharny@g= mail.com> wrote:
As we want to use client-api in all the tests we are thin= king
of moving the client-api to shared and rename shared.
=A0 =A0
This is a chicken and egg problem as they both depends on each other.
How are you going to rename shared ?


=A0
=A0 =A0 =A0wdyt?
=A0 =A0
+1 for the move to shared
+0 for the rename of shared.
=A0
IMO, shared *is* the API, client and server. If we are to rename it, I woul= d suggest ldap-api. Shared means nothing anyway.


<= br>
I agree with you 100% but we need to put shared into order if= we are going to really release this thing. =A0There's a lot of package= disorder and cleanup required. =A0

Regards,
=A0
--
Alex Karasulu<= br>My Blog :: http://www.jrol= ler.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
--001485f6299ae363ec048305c607--