Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53912 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2010 12:13:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2010 12:13:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 4008 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 12:13:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 3922 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 12:13:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 3914 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2010 12:13:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:13:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ayyagarikiran@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.215] (HELO mail-gx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.217.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:12:56 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so11450443gxk.12 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:12:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=450k8/G1Ne+BIjJ5uzcQu9vd/tSsVtYQZib6ucQMh8Q=; b=bCkSOsKFAJKILaAZivCVCWA0WBUU1KrdkVicdESOOHjwA9yjincDJR4ZOSbWLvlgBe XQq3oMm6L75vDSzXa+FmDHgqsYLTG/onqzhSykQxyIU8lxWhKmOHzDTntBbdxGWIArq/ 1LYSBUCi6pkpih8Aa+K1AligQZO/fiXOnlGII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UFI2DYhNwIY61mVZnHmG5luGhLVzpmisx2tYZOhW4LPTjDd4abL2qC1FlQI97p8i+y OfSyQ0EThAlXL0UumLtZDy/DQy8qzrSUsvNlO+mNjNXFyTlxuEgAlz/c3W78QD+ny/zg /RlOhP6Q+9ZvKdlZbbxy80GX+IXfZK4WyMA00= Received: by 10.101.10.9 with SMTP id n9mr3750446ani.63.1265717555005; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:12:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.3? ([122.169.128.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm1897yxd.34.2010.02.09.04.12.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:12:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B715123.8070504@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:42:19 +0530 From: Kiran Ayyagari User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: New Bind and pending operations question References: <4B714446.9000902@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B714446.9000902@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi, > > when the client issue a first BindRequest, the messageId will be '1'. It > will start a new LdapSession on the server, with all the subsequent > operations having an incremented messageId. The clinet is responsible > for the ID generation. > > Now, if the client issue a new BindRequest, should the messageId be > incremented, or reset to 1 ? My understanding is that we are stil in the > same LdapSession, am a bit confused about the semantics of this 'LdapSession', AFAIU, I treat one LdapSession is associated with a one successful bind. I might sound stupid, but this is a q I have, If we perform multiple binds on an already bound session then to which session the server associates the incoming requests? (my thinking is that that will be the last successfully bound session) Kiran Ayyagari