directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>
Subject Re: Question about new OC addition to the schema
Date Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:54:59 GMT
--On Saturday, December 12, 2009 2:15 AM +0100 Emmanuel Lecharny 
<elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:

> Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>> --On Friday, December 11, 2009 9:46 PM +0200 Ersin ER
>> <ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> IMO it's an error and should be rejected with the appropriate message.
>>> It's also possible that the user intended to write nn (or any valid
>>> similar attribute) instead of the second cn.
>>
>> Yes, it is always difficult to discern user intent, another excellent
>> point.
>
> Same corener case : what if we have an AT present in the MUST *and* in
> the MAY ? Should it be considered an error ?

Absolutely.  Then it is even more important to know what they meant.  Is it 
required, or is it optional?  That's a major distinction.

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Mime
View raw message