directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Question about new OC addition to the schema
Date Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:22:12 GMT
Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
> --On Saturday, December 12, 2009 2:15 AM +0100 Emmanuel Lecharny 
> <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>>> --On Friday, December 11, 2009 9:46 PM +0200 Ersin ER
>>> <ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> IMO it's an error and should be rejected with the appropriate message.
>>>> It's also possible that the user intended to write nn (or any valid
>>>> similar attribute) instead of the second cn.
>>>
>>> Yes, it is always difficult to discern user intent, another excellent
>>> point.
>>
>> Same corener case : what if we have an AT present in the MUST *and* in
>> the MAY ? Should it be considered an error ?
>
> Absolutely.  Then it is even more important to know what they meant.  
> Is it required, or is it optional?  That's a major distinction.

Make sense. Thanks for the feedback, it's really important for us as the 
SchemaManager will be part of Studio, the new client API and of course 
ADS. We would like to have the very same behavior when used to control 
OpenLDAP schema in Studio, for instance.

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com



Mime
View raw message