Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38045 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 10:36:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 10:36:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 98105 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 10:36:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 98043 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 10:36:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 98035 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 10:36:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:36:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:36:37 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so5819195bwz.25 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=y0TltSz1ma1WIcCJOVGl5H7cVFSvM/3kvKazxLzuSGI=; b=m4FWfn31ACiIV4KMwBN0+148EvzvNfUYrqTpCZziQ7MLxSrkXyTDsYMO6IYoxMMXMh 1BOLWckG1/9CJ56AOpXudvsc7bM3M/fN8D/3ekldsVM831IAMW/RWoXs6x4vrt83OAiy Py5jzlNy0oS9P+Hq0lQ9qkzNfbO1kQ6HlYyqM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=PFG6vkcHfA5cwncyPG12nUWtUDmH4d47XTgWMNtZ+YxDSpm6V4Ua8sLCuPZXXfVGLI NFzn3uKRHMYI32kMe/QoA43+ZL+Nr/jLBaj5poiqgdEHzNuT6Gm2I6179z8JG2RlW3zD g8M6wYWgqaatnisuY5IGo4IOa3saBYQxmX35k= Received: by 10.204.20.82 with SMTP id e18mr980514bkb.168.1258367776188; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.52? (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g28sm7231828fkg.45.2009.11.16.02.36.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:36:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: [Studio] Development for 1.5.1 From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot In-Reply-To: <4B012193.9040307@nextury.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:36:13 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <95165358-2724-4FF3-BBDC-2EE721B9063F@marcelot.net> References: <4B010F5F.4050304@apache.org> <4B012193.9040307@nextury.com> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On 16 nov. 2009, at 10:55, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> Hi dev, >>=20 >> after the 1.5 release we received some bug reports [1][2][3]. I think = we should fix those (and other) issues and prepare a bugfix release in = the near future. >>=20 >> I wonder if we should use SVN trunk or a branch to apply bugfixes. = The trunk already is set to version 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT, so I'd suggest we = use the trunk but only add bugfixes and small improvements. >>=20 >> Thoughts? > At this point, if no big improvement has been made in truk, let's use = trunk. Otherwise, we have to use a branch. Your call... +1 But when 1.5.1 is out and once we'll start working on the next major = release, it would be better to use the branch we created [1] for minor = service releases. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/branches/1.5.x/=