Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64341 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 10:54:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 10:54:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 25679 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 10:54:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 25604 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 10:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 25596 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2009 10:53:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:53:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:53:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 64274 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 10:53:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 10:53:34 -0000 Message-ID: <4AE822AC.6040600@apache.org> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:53:32 +0100 From: Stefan Seelmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Directory website re-organization References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: > We all think the link to Triplesec in the header should be removed and > placed on the left side of the window in the sandbox section (maybe the > code itself should be move to the sandbox in svn?). +1 to move it on the website and in svn. > We think we should focus the attention on the two projects that are > mature and working well, Apache DS and Studio. > > We also all agreed that it did not make sense anymore to keep the link > to Apache 1.0 in the header and that Apache DS 1.5 should simply be > renamed as 'Apache DS'. > > It would be very great to achieve this re-organization just before the > release of Studio 1.5 and the start of ApacheCon US. > It would be a great timing... Yes, great timing. Kind Regards, Stefan