directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ersin ER <ersin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: About AcceptAllSyntaxChecker...
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:46:02 GMT
So what's the motivation? To make it sound more like a LDAP?
Can there be anything that would not be validated with OSSC?

Does OSSC cover any textual and binary values?

If you think it's a catch all which is more appropriate we can do it, why
not.

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 13:13, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we have a AcceptAllSyntaxChecker which is associated to any syntax without
> any defined syntaxChecker. It's a catch all. I suggest we remove it and
> replace it with OctetStringSyntaxChecker, which is also a catch all.
>
> thoughts ?
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>


-- 
Ersin ER
http://www.ersiner.net

Mime
View raw message