directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Created: (DIRSHARED-37) Reconsider interfaces and base classes for Registries
Date Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:29:31 GMT
Reconsider interfaces and base classes for Registries

                 Key: DIRSHARED-37
             Project: Directory Shared
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Alex Karasulu
            Priority: Minor

Previously the registries were specifically used by the DS but now they must be used by both
studio and the LDAP API.  The DS demands strict handling of various schema object dependencies
while Studio does not and requires relaxed usage.  The LDAP API will have further requirements
perhaps, perhaps not.  However a couple semantic handling requirements were introduced into
the Registries to make them handle these various cases (relaxed verses strict usage).  Rather
than leaving these semantics in a single implementation we should instead reconsider splitting
the implementation and re-exposing interfaces to use different implementations. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message