On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <email@example.com> wrote:
Stefan Zoerner wrote:Ok. I will launch a vote then.
+1 for a release.
The documentation is currently very inconsistent, especially w.r.t. configuration, several times it states ("in the upcoming release").
Cleaning it up requires an official release as a stable base, in my opinion.
Thanks guys !
Btw, Stefan, I was wondering if defining our own "ldap certification" would worth the effort. The idea is to define tests for a better coverage of LDAP operations, using some tool to define, in order to run them against ADS, and potentially any LDAP server. Or maybe we can extend VSLDAP test suite.
Here, I think you will have a better idea than myself about the load it will be. In fact, I'm a bit fed up of writing unit tests when we can run a complete set of common tests, and also because usually, when I define a unit tests, I'm noyt always 100% sure what should be the behavior of a correct LDAP server, and it leads to some inconsistency (see the Modify operation problems we are dealing with).