directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <>
Subject Re: [Schema refactoring] OidRegistry
Date Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:41:07 GMT
Yep I see this was an incorrect implementation.  I guess you can have now a
map of sets.  An alias can now map to a set of SchemaObjects.  Note the map
must be case insensitive on keys.


On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <>wrote:

> I forgot to mention that we will get rid of the single OidRegistry, or at
> least that we will have to modify the lookups in this registry to pass the
> SchemaObjectType as a parameter.
> The rational for this change is that RFCs says we can have a  name used for
> more than one type of SO. For instance, the 'audio' name is used as an AT
> and as a LdapSyntax . Obviously, the oid -> name relation can't work, so we
> can't do a getOid( name ) and get a single OID when name=audio.
> The change in the API will be to add the SO :
> getOid( AT, 'audio' ) to get the OID for the audio AT
> getOid( LS, 'audio' ) to get the OID for the audio LS
> That means we store more than one map in the OidRegistry.
> Not such a big change though.
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny

Alex Karasulu
My Blog ::
Apache Directory Server ::
Apache MINA ::

View raw message