directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot ...@marcelot.net>
Subject Re: Extending OperationalAttributeInterceptor
Date Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:50:22 GMT
Hi,
FYI, your first mail has already received a few answers, no need to post it
again...

http://markmail.org/thread/otb7uhxxuh4uclq5

Hope this helps,
Pierre-Arnaud

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:25 PM, satish gutta <sat.gutta@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I had opened this  ticket
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1396
>
> and was suggested to communicate through mailing list.
>
> Stefan Seelmann added a comment - 06/Aug/09 08:09 AM
> Just for the record: Instead of using '+' (this would request all
> operational attributes) it is also possibe to reqeust the required attribute
> by their names (e.g. createTimestamp, modifyTimestamp, etc.). IMO the client
> must be fixed. All other LDAP server have the same behaviour and don't
> return operational attributes unless requested.
>
> Anyway, you could try to modify lookup(), list() and search() methods and
> add your needed operational attributes to the opContext.
> [ Show ยป ]
> Stefan Seelmann added a comment - 06/Aug/09 08:09 AM Just for the record:
> Instead of using '+' (this would request all operational attributes) it is
> also possibe to reqeust the required attribute by their names (e.g.
> createTimestamp, modifyTimestamp, etc.). IMO the client must be fixed. All
> other LDAP server have the same behaviour and don't return operational
> attributes unless requested. Anyway, you could try to modify lookup(),
> list() and search() methods and add your needed operational attributes to
> the opContext.
>
> Stefan Seelmann says :
>
> " it is also possibe to reqeust the required attribute by their names (e.g.
> createTimestamp, modifyTimestamp, etc.). "
>
> I am requesting operational attribute by their name and is returning null,
>
> The idea of using '+'  is not possible in my client code since the client
> code is IBM Puma code which cannot be changed by me.
>
> please let me know if there is any way I can resolve this issue?
>
> --
> Thanks&Regards
> Satish.Gutta
>
>

Mime
View raw message