directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (DIRSERVER-1383) There is a confusion between Anonymous access and Access to rootDSE
Date Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:50:34 GMT
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Just some history.  When we went from using JNDI interfaces in the core to
> using our own well defined interfaces many things were a mess including this
> area.  At one point I revamped this area of the code cleaning up a lot of
> the configuration which was still trying to use Properties a la the old JNDI
> way.
> I remember paying close attention to allow search operations to occur
> without a previous bind on the RootDSE regardless of whether or not
> anonymous binds were enabled or not.  This was done specifically to allow
> for client's to discover the various ways they could bind to the directory
> by reading the RootDSE's contents.
>
> I've always thought the RootDSE was something that should be world readable
> but I may be wrong now with better clarification in the latest RFC revamp.
>  Plus life has been hard and I cannot say I've been on top of these matters
> as I should.
>
> It might be best to consolidate the behavior of anonymous access to the
> server into a single configuration parameter which is an enumerated type
> with the following values.  Let's call it anonymousAccess:
>
>    o ANY - anonymous access to ANY entry is allowed
>    o ROOTDSE - anonymous access is only allowed on the RootDSE
>    o NONE - anonymous access is NOT allowed on any entry
>
> All these modes are still subject to any ACI restrictions that may
> additionally be configured by administrators.  This parameter only governs
> at a high level which operations the network protocol layer will allow to
> occur on entries.  Of course the lower layers also need to adhere to this
> policy if for example calls are made directly to the core interfaces via
> embedded server configurations where the API is used.
>
> WDYT?
>   
I think we can do a little bit simpler.

What about having the current flag (allowAnonymousAccess) which when set 
to false forbid any access to any entry *except* for rootDSE (ie 
anonymous search on rootDSE is allowed), plus an ACIItem to control the 
rootDSE access if really needed ?

Doing so will not change a lot of things in the server, and will 
leverage the ACI subsystem only if really necessary.

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Mime
View raw message