directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ersin ER <ersin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Some more cleanup ...
Date Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:48:05 GMT
Hi,

We should ask ourselves what really is "core" and do the refactoring
Emmanuel proposed.

This will lead to a more maintainable architecture.

Cheers,

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 14:38, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org>wrote:

> Hi gang,
>
> we have had an interesting discussion with Ersin lately, about how to use
> core-JNDI inside the SP interceptor. Let me explain what is the problem :
>
> SP allow a user to define some function which has access to the data the
> server is storing. That's fine, but in order to guarantee the ease of use,
> we decided to expose those objects through JNDI (no need to learn about a
> new API, even if it's a better one ;).
>
> Back in 1.5.4 (or was it 1.5.3?) we decided to move out of core the JNDI
> operations, and we created a module named core-jndi : superbe move, so far.
>
> Now, the problem is that we can't use this core-jndi into the SP
> interceptor, simply because core-jndi depends on core, so we can't make the
> SP interceptor depends on core-jndi, it would create a circular dependency.
>
> The solution is pretty simple, though : the SP interceptor has nothing to
> do into core, we should create a new module for it (interceptor-sp).
>
> At this point, we can also extend the idea to all the interceptors : make
> them modules, depending on core.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>


-- 
Ersin

Mime
View raw message