Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71616 invoked from network); 15 May 2009 09:29:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2009 09:29:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 56814 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2009 09:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 56735 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2009 09:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 56727 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2009 09:29:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 09:29:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.180] (HELO mail-ew0-f180.google.com) (209.85.219.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 09:29:48 +0000 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2429625ewy.25 for ; Fri, 15 May 2009 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2W+qy2Wc5zuIYGjGiBqQUjsQuqBnayMz8andaAzmtJs=; b=gQs0ShgSi7Or7ZZB7tHVWkM6kOyvqXVRw3KgJ9B3Ly9Ik/qZBIYfXh135W89kaEtOu Mx62AaiEpQeylPWgsrLBD8c3Q9NhDHyztIrB/faoiC4NHXng+3y5EnKxGpXcyNOHfyrk hvgoENv69DpaZakZMPMhlHW7C3NWiGmn1OHsk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=u32CG+kBVjskcgrEoT/NIOYb5EPUcnYwg3htKj+BuDC81Rn7snCYIBcsyvPACjRs7r JFagZ/uhW8ijyCQVxMch/Yuouo5k20E91+Pglq1vL2pjENllnvgEDmTtlG4QgCRjKE8T Dw+clkyiuJgDryUTQvj90q+KMqE+JjY4ZpaFI= Received: by 10.216.28.198 with SMTP id g48mr1127758wea.109.1242379768081; Fri, 15 May 2009 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.1? (vol75-3-82-66-216-176.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.216.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm2264391gve.14.2009.05.15.02.29.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 15 May 2009 02:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Emmanuel Lecharny Message-ID: <4A0D35F5.1060609@nextury.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:29:25 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [index review] Existance/Existence/Presence index References: <4A0BE9EC.5080707@nextury.com> <4A0C96E7.6070703@nextury.com> <4A0D33A3.2020506@nextury.com> <4A0D34CC.1070200@symas.com> In-Reply-To: <4A0D34CC.1070200@symas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Howard Chu wrote: > Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> while applying Kiran's patch for new system index, I found that we >> should fix some inconsistency. We have what we name 'Existance' index, >> which is the 'Presence' index. >> >> First, we should get rid of the 'existance' name, and replace it by >> 'existence'. >> >> Second, we should keep only one of the 'existence' or 'presence'. Unless >> I'm totally wrong, they are just the same. The question is which one >> should we keep ? I would prefer keeping 'existence' rather than >> presence, because it's more explicit. >> >> Thoughts ? > > "Presence" has established history in the protocol specs... As I replied to this mail in my response to your mail about the EntryCSN (I'm a bit confused ...) : - let's remove the exist[ae]nce and replace it by 'presence' (and not presance ;) - let's keep using a BTree for all those guys (UUID and entryCSN). We will have to find time to experiment how many micro-seconds we may spare by using a HTree on UUID later ;) > > -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org