directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [index review] Existance/Existence/Presence index
Date Sat, 16 May 2009 23:36:34 GMT
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org>wrote:

> Howard Chu wrote:
>
>> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while applying Kiran's patch for new system index, I found that we
>>> should fix some inconsistency. We have what we name 'Existance' index,
>>> which is the 'Presence' index.
>>>
>>> First, we should get rid of the 'existance' name, and replace it by
>>> 'existence'.
>>>
>>> Second, we should keep only one of the 'existence' or 'presence'. Unless
>>> I'm totally wrong, they are just the same. The question is which one
>>> should we keep ? I would prefer keeping 'existence' rather than
>>> presence, because it's more explicit.
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>
>> "Presence" has established history in the protocol specs...
>>
>


>
> As I replied to this mail in my response to your mail about the EntryCSN
> (I'm a bit confused ...) :
> - let's remove the exist[ae]nce and replace it by 'presence' (and not
> presance ;)
> - let's keep using a BTree for all those guys (UUID and entryCSN). We will
> have to find time to experiment how many micro-seconds we may spare by using
> a HTree on UUID later ;)
>

None of this context makes sense to me here Emm.

Alex



> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>


-- 
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org

Mime
View raw message