directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [index review] Existance/Existence/Presence index
Date Sat, 16 May 2009 23:53:53 GMT
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org>wrote:
>
>   
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> while applying Kiran's patch for new system index, I found that we
>>>> should fix some inconsistency. We have what we name 'Existance' index,
>>>> which is the 'Presence' index.
>>>>
>>>> First, we should get rid of the 'existance' name, and replace it by
>>>> 'existence'.
>>>>
>>>> Second, we should keep only one of the 'existence' or 'presence'. Unless
>>>> I'm totally wrong, they are just the same. The question is which one
>>>> should we keep ? I would prefer keeping 'existence' rather than
>>>> presence, because it's more explicit.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> "Presence" has established history in the protocol specs...
>>>
>>>       
>
>
>   
>> As I replied to this mail in my response to your mail about the EntryCSN
>> (I'm a bit confused ...) :
>> - let's remove the exist[ae]nce and replace it by 'presence' (and not
>> presance ;)
>> - let's keep using a BTree for all those guys (UUID and entryCSN). We will
>> have to find time to experiment how many micro-seconds we may spare by using
>> a HTree on UUID later ;)
>>
>>     
>
> None of this context makes sense to me here Emm.
>   

Can you be a bit more explicit, Alex ?

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Mime
View raw message