Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22030 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2009 16:00:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2009 16:00:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 68015 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2009 16:00:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 67915 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2009 16:00:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 67907 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2009 16:00:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:00:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.29] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:00:38 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so65946yxg.55 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/cTRlj6mSmR34Fd0hpEMQ1d1ZmWvVTG8Y4Jc9JZwk3E=; b=C9eB7jVxV2p/duuEdvnp6C9TGOhk1TT0rSZYng6KkS9lcKz5Lm9rX9fWFyfQ6rtBcV h/x1foQwtNuLRWhXK38/LQjtfBvd6VA5YHB/CCXYUhM3qvyfKMyf05OtuwtZ+rJ3hRHF /ZmfqVPElxX3meDhh2z0cEnBY40p24m5CP3jQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uTiOZnp2EN027LSVH0NSBx1nD+/Ng5VSuDOgkb3P3QMDdbMmU0V+nTmEqkejfgFIag vH6crqYkWjgxC11BgGs5Nj6QWF1bJbR6RnffuWxcJHP0TdEnly8wW8qTMqs9o39s2Uff kUz/Y+xODnEAaxlwLXEtvKg9p65cfSmEHqTnc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.186.21 with SMTP id j21mr1873684ybf.201.1238601617723; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <98d8c0860904010846g5078120cw97f5d691e7d7f2f4@mail.gmail.com> References: <98d8c0860904010130i6eaa6dfcgb12bcdb4752e6111@mail.gmail.com> <49D3842B.2030501@apache.org> <98d8c0860904010846g5078120cw97f5d691e7d7f2f4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:00:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Directory Studio 1.4.0 From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd517c87156860466806974 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd517c87156860466806974 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Guys can yall create another thread for discussions. We should keep [VOTE] threads clear so it's easy to count votes etc. For example I don't know if we're still voting on this thread or it's a discussion thread. Alex On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: > Hi Felix, > This is due to the features files (feature.xml) which contains "-SNAPSHOT" > at the end of the version. > The "-SNAPSHOT" is not allowed in a version number by OSGI, which makes the > verification fail. > > This will be fixed while releasing since the version numbers will then be > 1.4.0.v200904xx. > > Hope this helps, > Pierre-Arnaud > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Felix Knecht wrote: > >> > Let's vote now: >> > [ ] +1 | Release Apache Directory Studio 1.4.0 >> > [ ] +/-0 | Abstain >> > [ ] -1 | Do NOT release Apache Directory Studio 1.4.0 >> > >> > /!\ IMPORTANT NOTE /!\: The release of Studio implicates the release of >> > Shared (version 0.9.14), which mean this vote applies to all of these >> > two projects: Studio, Shared. >> > >> >> It looks like we do have a problem when going to the Help/Software >> Updates/Manage Configuration menu. We do not have any >> version correctly set. All versions are set to 0.0.0. Is this a problem? >> >> If not here's my >> +1 for the Studio release. >> +0 for the Shared release. >> >> See screenshot >> http://people.apache.org/~felixk/studio/ProductConfiguration.png >> >> >> > Thanks, >> > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot >> >> > --000e0cd517c87156860466806974 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guys can yall create another thread for discussions.=A0 We should keep [VOT= E] threads clear so it's easy to count votes etc.=A0=A0 For example I d= on't know if we're still voting on this thread or it's a discus= sion thread.=A0

Alex

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, = Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
Hi Felix,

This is due to the features files (feature.xml= ) which contains "-SNAPSHOT" at the end of the version.
The "-SNAPSHOT" is not allowed in a version number by OSGI, whic= h makes the verification fail.

This will be fixed while releasing since the version nu= mbers will then be 1.4.0.v200904xx.

Hope this help= s,
Pierre-Arnaud


On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Felix Knecht= <felixk@apache.org> wrote:
> Let'= ;s vote now:
> [ ] +1 | Release Apache Directory Studio 1.4.0
> [ ] +/-0 | Abstain
> [ ] -1 | Do NOT release Apache Directory Studio 1.4.0
>
> /!\ IMPORTANT NOTE /!\: The release of Studio implicates the release o= f
> Shared (version 0.9.14), which mean this vote applies to all of these<= br> > two projects: Studio, Shared.
>

It looks like we do have a problem when going to the Help/Software Up= dates/Manage Configuration menu. We do not have any
version correctly set. All versions are set to 0.0.0. Is this a problem?
If not here's my
+1 for the Studio release.
+0 for the Shared release.

See screenshot http://people.apache.org/~felixk/studi= o/ProductConfiguration.png


> Thanks,
> Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot



--000e0cd517c87156860466806974--