directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jürgen Weber (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DIRSTUDIO-486) Include Version Specifier in LDIF export
Date Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:59:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12702264#action_12702264
] 

Jürgen Weber commented on DIRSTUDIO-486:
----------------------------------------

Hi Stefan,

RFC 2849 requires a version-spec (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2849.txt), so I think it should
always be included. 
And it might puzzle users if print output is different to export output.

Contrary to what I wrote earlier, I am not sure if there should a checkbox at all, as the
RFC requires the version spec.

Or maybe there should be a checkbox for *not* having the version spec
[ ] Omit Version Specification

> Include Version Specifier in LDIF export
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSTUDIO-486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-486
>             Project: Directory Studio
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Jürgen Weber
>            Assignee: Stefan Seelmann
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Studio does not include a Version Specifier ("version: 1") in the generated LDIF export
> (see http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/5997.html   -> LDIF Content Records)
> E.g. the Novell LDAP classes for Java will not accept an LDIF that does not contain the
Version Specifier.
> Perhaps Studio could make this optional, e.g. by a setting on the Text formats preferences
page:
> [x] add Version Specifier 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message