Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61706 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2009 10:09:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2009 10:09:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 58040 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2009 10:09:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 57945 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2009 10:09:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 57937 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2009 10:09:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:09:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.171] (HELO mail-gx0-f171.google.com) (209.85.217.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:09:39 +0000 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1932498gxk.1 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:09:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ItTkDPUkW/hetrvOP5YE3tJcdLBKWEfS74NQRuQXllY=; b=QL6xsOItic4YsLpULbHpUncNBxwyxjkNdWRPT+da8W9eOBBJtCbCtiELm6iSckvRGT d4+mQOLHwmgTKLUlt/RqL85xIS/Z7pIliPrPynAla6oUajTqHwI372XHwEBxdMoT6hxG jtfkBQBnEYE1Lry5sySlFdHQZ/49lR8dYXaSY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=jcXtXFR6k+rWyiVShR5B8wLIem52EvHUPPydBGEp5MYdunYMFMcjkZfVPXfx4+lzwf VXZwb3WL32xdrqHojPn6GlyAXyjyG/Vi3G0Km91oX5u49Sr9dO9Yp34IJcMtzBMzNEdw 6LUDyMTrjSL79WUTtQs8wnsgvNnESxLh/wBfM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.20.65 with SMTP id e1mr2720349ibb.1.1237975758245; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:18 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 094c399f3be8a978 Message-ID: Subject: Package Reorganization From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255747464f8ece0465eeb1b3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0003255747464f8ece0465eeb1b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I have just recently pulled out some of the API classes in core into the new core-api package. I did this to be able to break out the new LdifPartition into it's own module. Eventually I would like to be able to push the JDBM partition into it's own jar as well. This step makes it trivial now. I could continue with this direction and really make some nice separations that make OSGi much more viable for ADS. Unfortunately we have to move rapidly so I stopped for now so I can move on to pushing the configuration into the DIT. I was wondering if anyone is interested in working with me on this aspect of breaking apart the core. Doing this is actually not bad and it helps to see the structure of the server not to mention the benefits we gain from doing it. Although I don't have the time to do it myself past how much was already done I can review the changes being made by someone else interested in ADS going to OSGi. Let me know if you're interested. Thanks, Alex --0003255747464f8ece0465eeb1b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all,

I have just recently pulled out some of the API classes in c= ore into the new core-api package.=A0 I did this to be able to break out th= e new LdifPartition into it's own module.=A0 Eventually I would like to= be able to push the JDBM partition into it's own jar as well.=A0 This = step makes it trivial now.=A0 I could continue with this direction and real= ly make some nice separations that make OSGi much more viable for ADS. =A0 = Unfortunately we have to move rapidly so I stopped for now so I can move on= to pushing the configuration into the DIT.

I was wondering if anyone is interested in working with me on this aspe= ct of breaking apart the core.=A0 Doing this is actually not bad and it hel= ps to see the structure of the server not to mention the benefits we gain f= rom doing it.=A0 Although I don't have the time to do it myself past ho= w much was already done I can review the changes being made by someone else= interested in ADS going to OSGi.

Let me know if you're interested.

Thanks,
Alex=A0
--0003255747464f8ece0465eeb1b3--