Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49481 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2009 09:52:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2009 09:52:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 89831 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2009 09:52:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 89800 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2009 09:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 89791 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2009 09:52:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:52:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.250 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.250] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.250) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:52:17 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so958579ana.10 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:51:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SNmIQwKyu+3hceR6dKf9v6+ZntH94jq9PWQl/4/DmLs=; b=HxLjynmw+kDgM5My64kMCmRqu+xWkbwxaKMNHoByGFYkmyWE/fOFcZKS/dYTFFmGEm DtJ/seE9x8VUp8TVoZCpvMK9c0I+l4aXpdrZNJbhyaC4y1HU3FaMk4W0REiurYaVjyFs S/lbFMUp9f30joL7+1XK7s7Y5zHfpc4LmRJGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WXnrJB7g9K8pE3ADblRK1v3cAptdL5UhzySSYpBHxJda/Ot4wFeE/wW6m/6T2SH8Tc BhDV2AJB/9oWEx8mq3UkSrTEx5YulN3X3beZE0PzmXvgY8XRJ3eGfA19jc0orFF0rVq3 FKLRkbeiJbQVwc9fZehzUsImYMRpbWABi4pWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: pajbam@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.30.67 with SMTP id t3mr242468ibc.21.1236937915907; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:51:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49BA2B4D.4060004@apache.org> References: <49BA2B0C.6050603@otego.com> <49BA2B4D.4060004@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:51:55 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dcf1d7d24f14ca8a Message-ID: <98d8c0860903130251r124e0ae1y5621eb67e08e6896@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Vote] Rename Skins module From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot To: Apache Directory Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255760b21641670464fd0d24 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0003255760b21641670464fd0d24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Felix, Good idea. +1 Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Felix Knecht wrote: > My +1 > > Felix Knecht schrieb: > > Hi all >> >> IMO we should have a more intuitive naming for the skin artifacts than >> just {module}-skin. I suggest to prefix all with 'directory'. >> >> Old artifact names: >> org.apache.directory.skins:skins (parent skin pom) >> org.apache.directory.skins:apacheds-skin >> org.apache.directory.skins:studio-skin >> org.apache.directory.skins:triplesec-skin >> >> New artifact names: >> org.apache.directory.skins:directory-parent-skins (parent skin pom) >> org.apache.directory.skins:directory-skin (renamed as this is used as >> default skin when no specific exists) >> org.apache.directory.skins:directory-studio-skin >> org.apache.directory.skins:directory-triplesec-skin >> >> >> This is a majority vote and stays open for 72 hours. >> >> Thanks >> Felix >> >> > --0003255760b21641670464fd0d24 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Felix,

Good idea.

+1

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud


On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Felix Kne= cht <felixk@apach= e.org> wrote:
My +1

Felix Knecht schrieb:

Hi all

IMO we should have a more intuitive naming for the skin artifacts than just= {module}-skin. I suggest to prefix all with 'directory'.

Old artifact names:
org.apache.directory.skins:skins (parent skin pom)
org.apache.directory.skins:apacheds-skin
org.apache.directory.skins:studio-skin
org.apache.directory.skins:triplesec-skin

New artifact names:
org.apache.directory.skins:directory-parent-skins (parent skin pom)
org.apache.directory.skins:directory-skin (renamed as this is used as defau= lt skin when no specific exists)
org.apache.directory.skins:directory-studio-skin
org.apache.directory.skins:directory-triplesec-skin


This is a majority vote and stays open for 72 hours.

Thanks
Felix



--0003255760b21641670464fd0d24--