Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49706 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2009 15:57:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2009 15:57:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 25689 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2009 15:57:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 25641 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2009 15:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 25631 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2009 15:57:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:57:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:57:33 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8994234C4AD for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 07:57:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1528944079.1235923032868.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 07:57:12 -0800 (PST) From: "Stefan Seelmann (JIRA)" To: dev@directory.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DIRSTUDIO-468) The LDIF parser does not correctly parse changes In-Reply-To: <738825304.1235920633572.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12677818#action_12677818 ] Stefan Seelmann commented on DIRSTUDIO-468: ------------------------------------------- Yes, according to RFC 2849. Maybe too strict. Should we allow any order? > The LDIF parser does not correctly parse changes > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: DIRSTUDIO-468 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-468 > Project: Directory Studio > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.3.0 > Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.4.0 > > > Trying to parse such a LDIF : > # principal: 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=admin,2.5.4.11=system > # timestamp: 1235905921781 > # revision: 1235905920724 > dn: 2.5.4.3=the person,2.5.4.11=system > changeType: modify > add: objectclass > objectclass: organizationalPerson > objectclass: inetOrgPerson > - > you get an error message, as the last '-' is considered as a wrong token -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.