I'm down with CiDIT over xbean.  I'd do this for 2.0.  I hate this XML crap.  Maybe this is something I can dedicate myself to as others work on replication.

I think this XBean stuff  is way to mysterious without any documentation.

Alex

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org> wrote:

- Documentation : This is also an something we must deliver. Documentation is not only good for our users, it's also good for us, as developpers, because writtng documentation helps to see where the API is not consistent.

Main problem is the configuration, which has changed with each minor version. In order to make any progress here, we need to finalize the configuration for the 2.0 first. There must be a decision at some point about the technologies used etc. (XML, xbeans, stored in DIT, ...). We had discussions about this topic every month.

Ok. Today, I spent something like 5 hours trying to get some new classes injected into LdapService, and make them work nicely with xbeans. So far, it's a plain failure.

I will be very clear : if we are to continue with xbeans+spring, I will -1 the release. This is absolutely not mature, cryptic, unusable, undocumented. In other words, it recalls me Maven 1.

Unless xbeans reach another level of stability, I want it out of the configuration. I'm fed of this piece of garbage.

I think this is something we have to discuss at ApacheCon, but the decision should be done on the ML.


--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org