directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Toward 2.0...
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:37:11 GMT
I'm down with CiDIT over xbean.  I'd do this for 2.0.  I hate this XML
crap.  Maybe this is something I can dedicate myself to as others work on
replication.

I think this XBean stuff  is way to mysterious without any documentation.

Alex

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org>wrote:

>
>  - Documentation : This is also an something we must deliver. Documentation
>>> is not only good for our users, it's also good for us, as developpers,
>>> because writtng documentation helps to see where the API is not consistent.
>>>
>>
>> Main problem is the configuration, which has changed with each minor
>> version. In order to make any progress here, we need to finalize the
>> configuration for the 2.0 first. There must be a decision at some point
>> about the technologies used etc. (XML, xbeans, stored in DIT, ...). We had
>> discussions about this topic every month.
>>
>
> Ok. Today, I spent something like 5 hours trying to get some new classes
> injected into LdapService, and make them work nicely with xbeans. So far,
> it's a plain failure.
>
> I will be very clear : if we are to continue with xbeans+spring, I will -1
> the release. This is absolutely not mature, cryptic, unusable, undocumented.
> In other words, it recalls me Maven 1.
>
> Unless xbeans reach another level of stability, I want it out of the
> configuration. I'm fed of this piece of garbage.
>
> I think this is something we have to discuss at ApacheCon, but the decision
> should be done on the ML.
>
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message