Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62393 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2009 08:23:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2009 08:23:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 30088 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2009 08:23:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 30030 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2009 08:23:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 30005 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2009 08:23:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:23:22 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:23:20 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9050D234C495 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:22:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <605887169.1234858979590.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:22:59 -0800 (PST) From: "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)" To: dev@directory.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DIRSTUDIO-387) Comments are removed! In-Reply-To: <606960016.1220387384500.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12674141#action_12674141 ] Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot commented on DIRSTUDIO-387: -------------------------------------------------- About, the ServerXmlIOV* classes, you're completely right. I very like the idea you're proposing. What about the ServerConfiguration* classes? Are we keeping them but mapping the access methods to be searching an internal DOM tree stored in them (replacing the existing internal structure)? Did I get this right? Thanks > Comments are removed! > --------------------- > > Key: DIRSTUDIO-387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-387 > Project: Directory Studio > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: studio-apacheds-configuration > Affects Versions: 1.2.0 > Environment: Windows XP SP1.3 w/JRE 1.5_16 > Reporter: Roger (Skip) Dooley > > Lets say your are editing a copy of a source file with your new fancy contest sensitive editor. > Everything looks great, you make some changes save the file, and later look at the file with a text editor. Much to your surprise all the comments you worked so hard to put in have been stripped by the editor! > Well that is what happens in Directory Studio's configuration editor. > The default server.xml file that comes with Dierctory Server has comments in it > After editing with Directory Studio's configuration editor, they are gone. > You wouldn't accept this behaviour with a source file? > Comments should be passed through.....or maybe an option default YES -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.