Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86966 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2009 10:33:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2009 10:33:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 48768 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2009 10:33:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48716 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2009 10:33:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48706 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2009 10:33:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:33:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.179.121.37] (HELO viefep17-int.chello.at) (62.179.121.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:33:34 +0000 Received: from edge04.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090218103313.NOUP14441.viefep17-int.chello.at@edge04.upc.biz> for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:33:13 +0100 Received: from felixknecht.ch ([84.72.24.104]) by edge04.upc.biz with edge id HNZB1b01q2ElHAk04NZCTz; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:33:13 +0100 X-SourceIP: 84.72.24.104 Received: (qmail 26353 invoked by uid 210); 18 Feb 2009 10:33:11 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.97 by odin (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-2.05st (clamdscan: 0.94.2/8998. perlscan: 2.05st. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.97):. Processed in 0.026925 secs); 18 Feb 2009 10:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.97?) (192.168.1.97) by 192.168.1.11 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2009 10:33:11 -0000 Message-ID: <499BE3E6.5060200@apache.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:33:10 +0100 From: Felix Knecht Organization: apache.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090211) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: svn commit: r745400 - /directory/studio/trunk/ldapbrowser-common/pom.xml References: <20090218074431.4AFAA2388999@eris.apache.org> <98d8c0860902180217h4bd959ebnaf0ba879906695b2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <98d8c0860902180217h4bd959ebnaf0ba879906695b2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Pierre-Arnaud > Hi Felix, > > I came across the same problem and was wondering if we should do this or > simply move the properties files to 'src/main/resources' (in the right > packages of course). Regarding to Eclipses RPC structure I think this would be the right place, whereas regarding from then Maven POV you're totally right to move them to the src/main/resources. I don't now what happens debugging in Eclipse when having them in the resources directory. Does it still works? I think to remember that the time I started with the i18n stuff I thought it easier to have it in the src/main/java tree because there I had (and probably still and only have) support for Eclipse tooling like 'Externalize strings...' and other gadgets. IMO it's easier to handle them using Eclipse tools when they are in the scr/main/java tree. Regards Felix