Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82979 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2009 16:19:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2009 16:19:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 90494 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2009 16:19:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 90291 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2009 16:19:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 90282 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2009 16:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:19:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.179.121.39] (HELO viefep19-int.chello.at) (62.179.121.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:19:19 +0000 Received: from edge02.upc.biz ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep19-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090212161855.QYBI6324.viefep19-int.chello.at@edge02.upc.biz> for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:18:55 +0100 Received: from felixknecht.ch ([84.72.24.104]) by edge02.upc.biz with edge id F4Js1b03P2ElHAk024JuUu; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:18:55 +0100 X-SourceIP: 84.72.24.104 Received: (qmail 29622 invoked by uid 210); 12 Feb 2009 16:18:52 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.97 by odin (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-2.05st (clamdscan: 0.94.2/8980. perlscan: 2.05st. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.97):. Processed in 0.040693 secs); 12 Feb 2009 16:18:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.97?) (192.168.1.97) by 192.168.1.11 with SMTP; 12 Feb 2009 16:18:52 -0000 Message-ID: <49944BEC.6020602@otego.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:18:52 +0100 From: Felix Knecht User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090211) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Layout of generated reports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi I tried to adapt the layout of the generated maven reports to look like the project website (d.a.o). For first samples see - http://people.apache.org/~felixk/studio/ (origin http://vm094.oxylos.org/projects/studio/) - http://people.apache.org/~felixk/studio-plugin/ (origin of http://vm094.oxylos.org/projects/studio-plugin/) - http://people.apache.org/~felixk/shared/ (origin http://vm094.oxylos.org/projects/shared/) I hope you enjoy then :-) For this I generated 3 different maven skins (ApacheDS - green, Studio - blue, TripleSec - red) (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/sandbox/felixk/skins). To make use of the skins also the **/src/site/site needs to be adapted - what I would do. I suggest to create a new project at directory root level containing the skins modules: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/skins/trunk/apacheds-skin https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/skins/trunk/studio-skin https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/skins/trunk/triplesec-skin https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/skins/branches https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/skins/tags All shared sub projects like shared/daemon/installers/... could use the ApacheDS skin (green). Do we need to vote on this? WDOT? Regards Felix