directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kiran Ayyagari <ayyagariki...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ChangeLog + revert, broken [2] ?
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:19:49 GMT

hi Emmanuel,

what I understood from the below mail is that the tag is also treated as a event but
AFAIK, tagging is not considered as a event in CL.

Kiran Ayyagari

Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
-- 
Kiran Ayyagari> So more info :
> 
> when you do something like :
> 
> tag
>   op0
> tag
>   op1
> tag
> tag
>   op2
> 
> only one tga is created. So when reverting twice (as I did, expecting
> to have an noop revert, and be back to op1), it move backward to op0,
> as if the stack was :
> 
> tag
>   op0
> tag
>   op1
> tag
>   op2
> 
> Shouldn't we 'name' the tags instead of using the operation number ?
> ie, having something like :
> 
> tag-0
>   op0
> tag-1
>   op1
> tag-2
> tag-3
>   op2
> 
> so that the first 'revert' reverts tag-3, and the second 'revert'
> reverts back to tag-2, leaving op1 available.
> 
> wdyt ?
> 

Mime
View raw message