directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: Summary of my work on the poms
Date Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:56:31 GMT
> Thanks for this Felix.  BTW sorry for not being able to test the deploy
> (crazy day yesterday).

NP. Hope you have a better day today.

>  You still need me to do this?

Thanks for your offer but I managed to deploy it somehow. See I
also updated the wiki with this information.

Now we need to get the snapshots deploy from the ASF CI, see also thread


> Alex
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Felix Knecht <> wrote:
>> - Update to latest ASF TLP (apache-5.pom)
>> - Consolidate pluginManagement sections in Directory TLP an have it in
>> subproject poms only where specific plugins are
>> needed. This should make maintenance of plugins easier and make sure
>> that
>> all of the directory projects are using the
>> same version of a plugin
>> - Adapt deployment configuration of snapshots to ASF TLP to make it
>> easier
>> to deploy Snapshots from the ASF CI (but up
>> to now it's not working, see mail I sent to the Infra ML:
>> - Update wiki howto deploy snapshot artifacts and generated site to
>> custom
>> location
>> (
>> - Remove default nag mail address a CI is using -> nag mails addresses
>> need
>> to be configured in the CI itself (due to
>> Emmanuels complaint ;) )
>> I hope that
>> - I catched everything and it still is building and working well
>> - Maintenance of plugins is made easier
>> - Poms are less polluted with 'common' stuff - more of the same in each
>> pom
>> - The Directory project is now more fit for ASF CI
>> Still some open tasks
>> - Make Snapshot deployment from ASF CI possible and remove the
>> corresponding sections in the subproject poms
>> - Where shall the generated documentation goto? Can this be done also by
>> ASF CI? Do we need a daily generation of the
>> documentation or shall we generate the documentation only when releasing
>> a
>> component and copy it then to the
>> directory.a.o site?
>> - If all above tasks are solved do we still need our oxylos CI?
>> Regards
>> Felix

View raw message