directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lorenz Breu <...@hot-shot.com>
Subject lookup returns an entry it shouldn't??
Date Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:03:54 GMT
hi guys

while testing my application that uses ADS as a backend (embedded) i 
noticed the following weird behaviour and would like to ask if it is my 
bad, or the apache's...

added the following attribute type:

entry = directory.newEntry(new 
LdapDN("m-oid="+SCHEMA_UIDS.get("slpIntegerAttribute")+", 
ou=attributeTypes, cn=slpService, ou=schema"));
entry.add("objectClass", "top","metaAttributeType", "metaTop");
entry.add("m-oid", SCHEMA_UIDS.get("slpIntegerAttribute"));
entry.add("m-name","slpIntegerAttribute");
entry.add("m-description", "The precursor for all new integer attribute 
types");
entry.add("m-equality","integerMatch");
entry.add("m-syntax", "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27");
directory.getAdminSession().add(entry);


then added a new attribute "slpInteger-number" with "SUP 
slpIntegerAttribute" (is correctly added to the registry):

then added a new entry that looks like this:

[STORE]: storing service service:osgi://hugentobler:124 as entry ServerEntry
    dn[]: slpserviceurl=service:osgi://hugentobler:124,dc=slpservices
    objectClass: slpService
    objectClass: extensibleObject
    slpInteger-number: 42
    slpInteger-number: 1337
    slpScopeList: default
    slpAttributeList: (number=42, 1337)
    slpScope: default
    slpServiceUrl: service:osgi://hugentobler:124

AND NOW I SEARCH WITH THE FOLLOWING FILTER:
String filter = 
(&(slpScope=default)(&(slpServiceUrl=service:osgi*)(|(slpInteger-number>=3000)(slpInteger-number<=40))))

with the following code:
List<Service> results = new ArrayList<Service>();
CoreSession session = directory.getAdminSession();
ServerLdapContext ctx = new ServerLdapContext(directory,session,new 
LdapDN("dc=slpservices"));
NamingEnumeration<SearchResult> list = ctx.search("", filter,new 
SearchControls());



=> THIS RETURNS THE AFOREMENTIONED ENTRY!!!
but it shouldn't, as the last disjunction is false, as both numbers are 
between 40 and 3000...

can anybody see where i went wrong?? or is there an error in the filter 
parsing within ADS?


cheers,
lorenz


Mime
View raw message