directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ayyagarikiran <>
Subject Re: [server.xml] Discussion
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:53:53 GMT
hi Emmanuel,

Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> ayyagarikiran wrote:
>>> Right, I forgot to mention that. There is also something about Quartz 
>>> integration.
>> hmm, isn't this a mandatory service which should run? ( which uses the 
>> LDAP store to store its job info )
> yes, but we might need to configure it, nope ?
yeah, good to have this option ( after seeing the internals of quartz and its properties file
while implementing the new 
store I just thought of bundling it with code(not a good idea) )

>>> At some point, having a monolithic server.xml will be totally 
>>> unmanageable. May be we should think about a more versatile system, 
>>> with sub files ?
>> hmm, IMHO configuring a system with more than one file may cause 
>> frustration to the user.
> That's true, but configuring a system with a configuration  file 
> thousands lines long is also painful...

Kiran Ayyagari

View raw message