directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [server.xml] Discussion
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:10:47 GMT
ayyagarikiran wrote:
> hi Emmanuel,
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>> - Modifications to come
>>
>> As we will have to review the replication system, which is not 
>> documented atm, it's pretty clear that we will have to modify the 
>> server.xml file to deal with replication. Hopefully, this is an 
>> isolate part of the configuration, so I'm not too worried about that.
>> MINA 2 migration will impact the file a lot. We have added numerous 
>> parameters, and removed the Datagram & Socket beans, replaced by 
>> direct configurations into the different servers, but it might not be 
>> the perfect idea. Tjis has to be discussed.
>> We also have to work on a failover mechanism, based on a journalized 
>> system (probably), and it will need some configuration too.
>>
>> So far, this is what comes to my mind currently, but this might be 
>> partial.
>>
> I think embedded jetty server may also need to be configured through 
> server.xml, IMO it may look like the below mentioned
>
>  <!-- by default the jetty server is not enabled-->
>  <jettyServer enable="false">
>    <confFilePath>path/to/conf/file</confFilePath>
> </jettyServer>
Right, I forgot to mention that. There is also something about Quartz 
integration.

At some point, having a monolithic server.xml will be totally 
unmanageable. May be we should think about a more versatile system, with 
sub files ?

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Mime
View raw message