Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61537 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2008 09:18:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2008 09:18:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 69798 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2008 09:18:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 69760 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2008 09:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 69749 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2008 09:18:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:18:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.190] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:17:02 +0000 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so2193072mue.5 for ; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:17:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=/u1MRFkR03K7iWJrfYp+i2r4LZvJ7pZwTNsT7R+IPtU=; b=T6qmiau/9tOn/LG/uH8XEApW7HjGmJXB8p+q8RYHJlznpliJlYt0MNqofXHeR+2ESC 9xP7zAGWabYgNU8meXNgtjwErwjw3msEYnECr9I8d8fh2v9tp7LNc/7pROZO+LiLi5D9 hz2mGFABb2eT4AcRS+dbB6Ma7iEu/1XUQhjzw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=L27lYXNXd66mRPkqtVJAKyf3zUYXwq0aPeqHd5aGlS5mgmLCRPvuc/VtTzO2LzIz6Q vjAozsvnB+7zMjlciEQ1+eZG9NRjah80e9clqcAwTxOnsSp+0YhjfWSpMuzrWV4RVglh 4yh5hg1Q1CpBNRSXieWf/ZpsYoQmeIrdrxQrI= Received: by 10.103.214.13 with SMTP id r13mr2905650muq.37.1226222254378; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:17:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.11? (vol75-3-82-66-216-176.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.216.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm8288860mue.15.2008.11.09.01.17.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:17:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4916AAAB.3040307@nextury.com> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:17:31 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [SHARED-LDAP] new methods in DateUtils class References: <4915EAEC.2010502@gmail.com> <491606F3.1090802@apache.org> <4916A2CE.6060203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4916A2CE.6060203@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Emmanuel Lecharny X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > thanks Seelmann for the info, however the quartz LDAP store on which am > currently working will be part of the server so using DateUtils will > do the > work. > > I have another question, the clients will change the scheduled > execution time for a quartz job/trigger, in this case > > 1) should we force the user to specify time in GMT? or > 2) would it be better if we take the client's timezone along with time > and doing > the actual conversion to GMT The rule should be that the user must work with his TZ, and the server should work with GMT, I think. Then, it's just a matter of converting date back and forth. -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org