directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DIRSTUDIO-410) Referral handling is problematic
Date Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:28:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12637282#action_12637282
] 

Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSTUDIO-410:
---------------------------------------------

The biggest problem I see is that JNDI 'ignore' semantic is the opposite to what you have
implemented with the 'ignore' option : it always send the ManageDsaIT control. The idea is
that JNDI should 'ignore' the referral characteristic of the entry, and just consider it as
a normal entry, instead of sending back a Referral result.

I'm afraid that those who are using Studio may be tainted by JNDI... (btw, the 'follow' option
is a typical JNDI option).

Anyway, what I would suggest is that we propose something more in line with what really happens
: instead of using one word, express the referral handling processing. Something like :
- Follow referrals
- Ignore referrals
- Ask the users (ie, throw)

wdyt ?

> Referral handling is problematic
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSTUDIO-410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-410
>             Project: Directory Studio
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
>            Priority: Critical
>
> The way referrals are handled in the server is problematic. 
> There is a mix between JNDI and plain LDAP (ManageDsaIT control usage). 
> Beside the fact that one should be able to select the way referral should be handled
on each request (it's painful to have to disconnect when you change the global property),
for people used to deal with JNDI, the 'manage' option does not make sense.More than that,
'manage' defaults to 'ignore' (which is plain OK, so far), but the 'ignore' option is not
activated.
> I would suggest that we switch to 'ignore', 'throw' and 'follow' instead of 'follow',
'ignore' and 'manage'

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message